He's the stations chief engineer, a friend of mine for several years.. I texted him late one night, he checked the next morning.
Paul On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Chuck Hutton <[email protected]> wrote: > Paul - > > So you called the guy. How was he able to give a definitive answer over > the phone? Without further details, it seems like he said "no" without any > evidence. Or maybe parts of the story were left out??? > > Chuck > > ________________________________________ > From: IRCA <[email protected]> on behalf of Paul B. Walker, > Jr. <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 10:27 PM > To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America > Subject: Re: [IRCA] [NRC-AM] 1500khz Mystery Station > > I can confirm it is NOT WKAX Russellvile, AL. I spoke to their engineer > today... So without going back to see if that's directly in the path and in > consideration, we can rule it out. > > Paul > > On Wednesday, February 10, 2016, Robert LaFore <[email protected]> wrote: > > > For mine (320 from Acworth GA) Magnetic---- > > > > On 2/9/2016 10:41 PM, Chuck Hutton wrote: > > > >> That is always true for loop antennas. There's no reason to even mention > >> the maximum. The null is sharp (narrow) and deep and there fore easily > >> detected. The peak is extremely broad and you won't see a difference if > you > >> are off by 20, 30 or more degrees. > >> > >> Now if I only knew if people were using magnetic or true north...... > >> > >> Chuck > >> > >> ________________________________________ > >> From: IRCA <[email protected]> on behalf of Kevin Redding < > >> [email protected]> > >> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 3:26 AM > >> To: Glenn Hauser; Mailing list for the International Radio Club of > America > >> Subject: Re: [IRCA] [NRC-AM] 1500khz Mystery Station > >> > >> As I was taught in the Navy.... > >> > >> You find the signal. Then you rotate the antenna for minimum signal. > That > >> is the direction the sending station is located. > >> > >> Kevin > >> Crump, TN > >> > >> On Feb 9, 2016, at 6:27 PM, Glenn Hauser via IRCA wrote: > >> > >> This is getting more and more confusing. Tom, do you mean then that the > >>> maximum signal would be 90 degrees away from 170, i.e., 80 / 260 > degrees, > >>> or do you mean that 170 degrees is the direxion of the maximum, not > minimum > >>> signal? > >>> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> IRCA mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca > >> > >> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the > >> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the > >> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers > >> > >> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org > >> > >> To Post a message: [email protected] > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> IRCA mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca > >> > >> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the > >> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the > >> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers > >> > >> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org > >> > >> To Post a message: [email protected] > >> > >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > IRCA mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca > > > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the > > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the > > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers > > > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org > > > > To Post a message: [email protected] > > > > > _______________________________________________ > IRCA mailing list > [email protected] > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org > > To Post a message: [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > IRCA mailing list > [email protected] > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org > > To Post a message: [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list [email protected] http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: [email protected]
