FWIW (maybe a little), in the informal numbering system used by DXers since 
2011, Chuck, you were indeed at Rockwork 3 on Tuesday morning, not Rockwork 5. 
But none of these numbers are "official," and anybody can call any turnoff 
whatever he wants.

In August of 2011 (the very first time that a wacky DXer tried setting up at 
the plunging cliff) I assigned numbers to each of the Rockwork Highway 101 
turnoffs, starting with #1 for the first turnoff as you approach the cliff from 
the north. As such, #2 is the relatively large turnoff as you proceed up the 
hill, and #3 is the somewhat smaller turnoff after that. By now everyone knows 
where #4 is (including the squatters), while #5 is another relatively small 
turnoff near the crest of Highway 101. Turnoff #6 is the rather wide, open area 
at the crest of Highway 101, which always had plenty of space for antenna setup 
until the squatters discovered it.

Up until last week none of these numbers were very important, since every DXer 
simply set up at #4, everybody knew where it was, and everybody accepted the 
name. After this summer's squatter proliferation we had to scramble every 
morning for antenna setup space, though, and the turnoff numbers suddenly 
became very important in pre-session scouting text messages. In any case, if 
you wish to call turnoff #3 by a different number (#5), that's certainly OK-- 
the only risk is that the other DXers may misunderstand you.

Gary


> On August 10, 2018 at 6:52 PM Chuck Hutton <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>     FWIW (a little, as we are comparing Rockworks sites),  I was at Rockworks 
> 5 instead of 3 on Tuesday morning..
> 
>     Chuck
> 
> 
> 
>     ---------------------------------------------
>     From: IRCA <[email protected]> on behalf of Gary DeBock 
> <[email protected]>
>     Sent: Tuesday, August 7, 2018 7:01 PM
>     To: America, Mailing
>     Subject: [IRCA] Five DXer Session at the Rockwork Cliff
>      
>          <CLIP>
> 
>          Antenna setup in total darkness right next to total strangers is 
> never boring, and this morning Tom and Chuck needed some reasonable space to 
> set up their broadband loops. When I drove up at 1150 (0450 local time) I 
> noticed that Tom was setting up at Rockwork 4, and Chuck at Rockwork 3 
> (apparently along with Nick, who was testing out propagation at various 
> places with verticals). By now Craig had become fully accustomed to my 
> vehicle, and he showed up at a perfect time to follow me to Rockwork 6, which 
> had just enough space in between the squatters to set up four large FSL's and 
> PVC bases.
> 
>      
>     73 and Good DX,
> 
>     Gary DeBock (in Nehalem, OR for two more days)
> 
>       
> 
> 
> 
 
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
[email protected]
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: [email protected]

Reply via email to