Rethinking a bit, I actually don't see anything which cannot be discussed on the public list anyway.
So c'mon folks, wdyt? We need our feedback :) LieGrue, strub --- On Fri, 4/22/11, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > Subject: thinking about a release > To: [email protected] > Date: Friday, April 22, 2011, 7:23 AM > Hi folks! > > > I peaked over the sources a little bit (still don't have > much clue) and it doesn't look that bad imo. > > What about thinking off a new isis 0.9.0-incubating > release? > > We did this 0.9 version scheme in a few other projects > which are already close to 1.0 to show it's not _yet_ 1.0 > but already quite near. > > The fact that we have a incubator release out there is > pretty important for the adoption rate sometimes. > > WDYT? > > This of course will need a bit of preparation: > > > 1.) re-check the IP clearance. Especially our 3rd party > dependencies. Even an incubator release must meet our > license requirements. E.g. use specs from > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/ > instead of any javax.* or org.hibernate.* maven artifacts if > possible. > > 2.) We better not need any 3rd party <repositories>. > If we have such a thing, then we should look if there are > any alternatives. That's no hard show stopper but generally > a good idea to look at > > 3.) Go through all open jira issues and identify show > stopper issues. > > 4.) create a new isis-0.9.0 'Version' in Jira and move all > bugs to 'fixed in isis-0.9.0' in Jira. > > Anything I forgot? > > LieGrue, > strub >
