I'd very much like to see a release, what would you add to / cut from Dan's https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-20https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-20 ?
Best Regards Mike Burton ( iPhone) . On 22 Apr 2011, at 14:26, "Kevin Meyer - KMZ" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Mark, > > I get the impression that most of (Dan's) hesistation has been about > the documentation.. we don't want to lose potential interest because of > this.. > > Having said that, what do the people who have joined more recently > have to say? Sabine, Michael, Vangjel, etc? > > Kevin > > > On 22 Apr 2011 at 9:56, Mark Struberg wrote: > > >>> Hi folks! >>> >>> >>> I peaked over the sources a little bit (still don't have >>> much clue) and it doesn't look that bad imo. >>> >>> What about thinking off a new isis 0.9.0-incubating >>> release? >>> >>> We did this 0.9 version scheme in a few other projects >>> which are already close to 1.0 to show it's not _yet_ 1.0 >>> but already quite near. >>> >>> The fact that we have a incubator release out there is >>> pretty important for the adoption rate sometimes. >>> >>> WDYT? >>> >>> This of course will need a bit of preparation: >>> >>> >>> 1.) re-check the IP clearance. Especially our 3rd party >>> dependencies. Even an incubator release must meet our >>> license requirements. E.g. use specs from >>> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/ >>> instead of any javax.* or org.hibernate.* maven artifacts if >>> possible. >>> >>> 2.) We better not need any 3rd party <repositories>. >>> If we have such a thing, then we should look if there are >>> any alternatives. That's no hard show stopper but generally >>> a good idea to look at >>> >>> 3.) Go through all open jira issues and identify show >>> stopper issues. >>> >>> 4.) create a new isis-0.9.0 'Version' in Jira and move all >>> bugs to 'fixed in isis-0.9.0' in Jira. >>> >>> Anything I forgot? >>> >>> LieGrue, >>> strub >>> > >
