Hi all... I know I've been off for long time, and I already feel guilty about it. Please I want to re-join and and even take the chance preparing for the retreat in Ireland.
Dan any specific direction you would suggest me to look at ? On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 11:53 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > Then all is fine. We are allowed to compile against jimi, but we must not > provide it in our binary distribution ( -> <scope>provided</scope> ). > > Best is to check for the absence of jimi with Class.forName() or likewise, > and just don't provide image manipulation features if its not present. > But for what I've seen this is already done this way, isn't? > > LieGrue, > strub > > --- On Sat, 4/23/11, Dan Haywood <[email protected]> wrote: > >> From: Dan Haywood <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: thinking about a release >> To: [email protected] >> Date: Saturday, April 23, 2011, 9:44 PM >> >> On 23/04/2011 21:57, Siegfried Goeschl wrote: >> > >> > Is Jimi a mandatory or an optional dependency? >> It's a built-time only dependency; it's used by the >> maven-docbkx-plugin >> to generate our PDFs and HTML. >> >> There's no need for anyone using Isis to install JIMI >> manually or otherwise. >> >> Is that ok? else what advice for us? >> >> Thanks >> Dan >> >> > -- Thanks - Mohammad Nour Author of (WebSphere Application Server Community Edition 2.0 User Guide) http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg247585.html - LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour - Blog: http://tadabborat.blogspot.com ---- "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving" - Albert Einstein "Writing clean code is what you must do in order to call yourself a professional. There is no reasonable excuse for doing anything less than your best." - Clean Code: A Handbook of Agile Software Craftsmanship "Stay hungry, stay foolish." - Steve Jobs
