PTCL is moving ahead with STM-1 on a non CIR based design, despite our
proposal to them for a CIR based design.
We should force PTCL to change its design, and tell them in clear words,
that the current design is not acceptable to us, so they should not waste
their time on testing it.
I think this letter should go from President ISPAK, as the technical
committe has already sent its recomendations to PTCL, and they are not
listening to it.
Regards,
Nasir.
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, sbhutta wrote:
> Dear Mr.Jamal Nasir Khan.
> Chairman Technical Commiitte ISPAK.
>
> AOA,
>
> We have serious compalint that bandwidth is not being provided to us as much we are
>paying for Full Circuit 2Mbps with Tier-1 Internet Backbone Connectivity (EMIX) Via
>SMW-3 cable for ISP's/Software @ US$.22500/-
>
> Never more than 1.5 or 1.6 MB is received to ISPs. While we are paying for 2.MB.
>
> To avoid this problem from STM-1 circuit, we should makesure with PTCL that there
>would be no such situation to be faced by us in future.
>
> Some of our members have noticed that while their shared circuit was shifted
>from EMIX to STM-1 for testing the ping time were higher on a almost no load circuit
>of STM-1 then on a loaded circuit of EMIX.
>
> We fail to understand the higher ping times and would like the ISPAK technical
>committee to formally be involved in testing and approval of the STM1.
>
> I seek your coments to proceed further.
> Best regards,
>
> Sanaullah Bhutta,
> President ISPAK.
>
------------------------- ISPAK --------------------------
ISPAK Discussion List. Members are limited to officials of
ISPs and ESPs of Pakistan and select media representatives.
-------------- http://ispak.net.pk -----------------------
