With the letter informing PTCL that they should and must change their
design, we must also tell them that the STM-1 should only be sold with an
SLA, and it must be developed with the consent of ISPAK.
Regards,
Nasir.
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Naeem Haq wrote:
> Dear All ,
>
> This does not come as a big surprise , as quite frankly PTCL had sidelined
> ISPAK while in the design stage . In fact , the secret meetings with SYSNET
> to get the NAPs going were planned so that there is minimal interfearence
> from anyone technical enough who can pinpoint the technical issues . In fact
> , some PTCL officials must have had some personal motive in this ... as a
> project of this nature should not have been handled in the manner it has
> been ; besides I have never seen PTCL so over effecient !!
>
> Apart from CIR issues , there are numerous other issues ranging from Router
> sizing to basic architectural faults... and yes , we are all going to suffer
> from it. I think its time that someone should come up with the Good SLA for
> us or otherwise we are all dead in the water .
>
> Naeem Haq
> NEXLINX
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Aly Ramzan
> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 9:51 AM
> To: A.R. Nasir Qureshi; sbhutta
> Cc: Jamal Nasir Khan; ISPAK
> Subject: Re: ISPAK: STM1 Performance
>
>
> Nasir Saheb,
>
> The non CIR based design is not the only problem. Bhutta Saheb's mail
> indicates a poor circuit performance on almost no utilization, the design
> problem may kick in at about 1/4 loaded circuit.
>
> We were promised a ping time of 200ms, the ping times they have now are
> about 350ms.
>
> Regards,
>
> Aly Ramzan
> CubeXS
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "A.R. Nasir Qureshi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "sbhutta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "Jamal Nasir Khan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "ISPAK" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 8:00 PM
> Subject: Re: ISPAK: STM1 Performance
>
>
> >
> > PTCL is moving ahead with STM-1 on a non CIR based design, despite our
> > proposal to them for a CIR based design.
> >
> > We should force PTCL to change its design, and tell them in clear words,
> > that the current design is not acceptable to us, so they should not waste
> > their time on testing it.
> >
> > I think this letter should go from President ISPAK, as the technical
> > committe has already sent its recomendations to PTCL, and they are not
> > listening to it.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Nasir.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, sbhutta wrote:
> >
> > > Dear Mr.Jamal Nasir Khan.
> > > Chairman Technical Commiitte ISPAK.
> > >
> > > AOA,
> > >
> > > We have serious compalint that bandwidth is not being provided to us as
> much we are paying for Full Circuit 2Mbps with Tier-1 Internet Backbone
> Connectivity (EMIX) Via SMW-3 cable for ISP's/Software @ US$.22500/-
> > >
> > > Never more than 1.5 or 1.6 MB is received to ISPs. While we are paying
> for 2.MB.
> > >
> > > To avoid this problem from STM-1 circuit, we should makesure with PTCL
> that there would be no such situation to be faced by us in future.
> > >
> > > Some of our members have noticed that while their shared circuit was
> shifted from EMIX to STM-1 for testing the ping time were higher on a almost
> no load circuit of STM-1 then on a loaded circuit of EMIX.
> > >
> > > We fail to understand the higher ping times and would like the ISPAK
> technical committee to formally be involved in testing and approval of the
> STM1.
> > >
> > > I seek your coments to proceed further.
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Sanaullah Bhutta,
> > > President ISPAK.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------- ISPAK --------------------------
> > ISPAK Discussion List. Members are limited to officials of
> > ISPs and ESPs of Pakistan and select media representatives.
> > -------------- http://ispak.net.pk -----------------------
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------- ISPAK --------------------------
> ISPAK Discussion List. Members are limited to officials of
> ISPs and ESPs of Pakistan and select media representatives.
> -------------- http://ispak.net.pk -----------------------
>
>
------------------------- ISPAK --------------------------
ISPAK Discussion List. Members are limited to officials of
ISPs and ESPs of Pakistan and select media representatives.
-------------- http://ispak.net.pk -----------------------
