A bad design is a bad design. It will have problems that we for see, and
will have other hidden problems as well.
Regards,
Nasir.
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Aly Ramzan wrote:
> Nasir Saheb,
>
> The non CIR based design is not the only problem. Bhutta Saheb's mail
> indicates a poor circuit performance on almost no utilization, the design
> problem may kick in at about 1/4 loaded circuit.
>
> We were promised a ping time of 200ms, the ping times they have now are
> about 350ms.
>
> Regards,
>
> Aly Ramzan
> CubeXS
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "A.R. Nasir Qureshi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "sbhutta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "Jamal Nasir Khan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "ISPAK" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 8:00 PM
> Subject: Re: ISPAK: STM1 Performance
>
>
> >
> > PTCL is moving ahead with STM-1 on a non CIR based design, despite our
> > proposal to them for a CIR based design.
> >
> > We should force PTCL to change its design, and tell them in clear words,
> > that the current design is not acceptable to us, so they should not waste
> > their time on testing it.
> >
> > I think this letter should go from President ISPAK, as the technical
> > committe has already sent its recomendations to PTCL, and they are not
> > listening to it.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Nasir.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, sbhutta wrote:
> >
> > > Dear Mr.Jamal Nasir Khan.
> > > Chairman Technical Commiitte ISPAK.
> > >
> > > AOA,
> > >
> > > We have serious compalint that bandwidth is not being provided to us as
> much we are paying for Full Circuit 2Mbps with Tier-1 Internet Backbone
> Connectivity (EMIX) Via SMW-3 cable for ISP's/Software @ US$.22500/-
> > >
> > > Never more than 1.5 or 1.6 MB is received to ISPs. While we are paying
> for 2.MB.
> > >
> > > To avoid this problem from STM-1 circuit, we should makesure with PTCL
> that there would be no such situation to be faced by us in future.
> > >
> > > Some of our members have noticed that while their shared circuit was
> shifted from EMIX to STM-1 for testing the ping time were higher on a almost
> no load circuit of STM-1 then on a loaded circuit of EMIX.
> > >
> > > We fail to understand the higher ping times and would like the ISPAK
> technical committee to formally be involved in testing and approval of the
> STM1.
> > >
> > > I seek your coments to proceed further.
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Sanaullah Bhutta,
> > > President ISPAK.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------- ISPAK --------------------------
> > ISPAK Discussion List. Members are limited to officials of
> > ISPs and ESPs of Pakistan and select media representatives.
> > -------------- http://ispak.net.pk -----------------------
> >
>
>
------------------------- ISPAK --------------------------
ISPAK Discussion List. Members are limited to officials of
ISPs and ESPs of Pakistan and select media representatives.
-------------- http://ispak.net.pk -----------------------
