Steve, I prefer to keep dump() in the source, without this call [--debug-phase=<value>] switch is not possible. And it's very helpful for debugging compiler bugs. Special LLVM build should not be a big deal, as it's almost always need to be patched version of LLVM. So adding extra CMake flag seems to be not an issue.
Dmitry. On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 10:59 PM, Steve Hill <st...@hill-mail.co.uk> wrote: > Hi Dmitry, > > My apologies for interrupting your vacation! > > I agree that my overall changes are not likely to be useful - I was > thinking of a pull request that replaces the use of dump() so that the > special build of LLVM for v5.0 and later can be removed. Let me know what > you think. > > I can certainly look at starting a wiki page on the subject of cross > compilation too once I've tested that it is working properly (I've got a > build that looks to be producing a Linux object file but, beyond the 'file' > command giving promising output, I've not confirmed that it is good...) > > Thanks for your help, > > S. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Intel SPMD Program Compiler Developers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ispc-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Intel SPMD Program Compiler Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ispc-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
