TO UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe issforum" in the body of your message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for help with any problems! ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
So, does that mean SP 2.0 will replace SSD 2.6? Thanks > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Ward, Matthew (ISSAtlanta) > Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 9:46 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Site Protector Reporting > > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe issforum" in the body of your message > to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for help with any > problems! > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- > -- > > Hello, > > My name is Matthew Ward and I am now the Product Manager for SiteProtector. > It is not normally my practice to spam issforum with product information, > but I thought that since folks keep mentioning this thread to me, I ought > to give you guys a little information so that you can make the best > possible decision as you decide what to build in the interim. Here is what > SiteProtector is going to have in SiteProtector 2.0, due out in Q4: > > 1) Graphical reports that display metrics of security information across > products for management (Attacks, vulnerabilities and Attacked > vulnerabilities if you have fusion) > 2) Graphical reports that display the trends across SiteProtector groups, > again, geared for management > 3) Detail analysis reports ranging from more summary information to the > nitty gritty parameters of the events and vulnerabilities. > 4) All of the views from FastAnalysis, plus similar views for > vulnerability analysis. When we start importing 3rd party data, that data > will be analyzed in a similar fashion. > 5) Right click navigations in a FastAnalysis-like fashion to guide the > user through security analysis. > 6) All of the text and graphical views can be exported to HTML, PDF, CSV > and Printer, and you can do so either on demand or on a schedule. > 7) Lastly, we will have cross-site reporting, so you can perform reporting > across multiple sites. > > So, in deciding what to build yourself, bear the above in mind as to how > far you go. I personally know that you can build a few, very effective > reports in a short period of time to get the maximum value with the > minimum work, and you may want to avoid reports that are more complicated > that you may be able to live without for the remaining period of time... > > I have presented the reports to many customers and have come to the > conclusion that reporting will be at least satisfactory in SiteProtector > 2.0, so hopefully that will alleviate your concerns and difficulties with > ISS reporting in general. > > Matthew > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nguyen, Jimmy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 3:06 PM > To: 'Lanzilotta, Chris S. (MBS)'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: Site Protector Reporting > > > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe issforum" in the body of your message > to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for help with any > problems! > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- > -- > > I probably would at least do substantial damage for a reporting feature in > SiteProtector as well. I also have been told that this capability will be > in the next release. I believe in the interim that there is a tool that > can > help facilitate reporting in SiteProtector and that it resides on the ISS > ftp site, but if you ftp://www.iss.net, nothings there, well at least not > for an anonymous login. > > Jimmy H. Nguyen > Senior Network Security Engineer > CCNP, CCDP, MCSE, MCP+I, NSA IAM, CCSE, Network+, SCP > NCI Information Systems, Inc. > DRMS Headquarters Battle Creek, MI. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 616-961-4543 > > "Because this is engineering and not mathematics, inifinity turns out to > be > 15." -Radia Perlman > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lanzilotta, Chris S. (MBS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 6:48 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Site Protector Reporting > > > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe issforum" in the body of your message > to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for help with any > problems! > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- > -- > > I would kill for this... Well maybe not kill, but you get the point!!! > > This is just one of the sorely missed features that should have been > released in SiteProtector from the start. I keep hearing it will be in > the > next release, whenever that is. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Simon Desmeules [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:51 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Site Protector Reporting > > > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe issforum" in the body of your message > to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for help with any > problems! > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- > -- > > Hi, > > Site Protector doesn't come along with the reporting function and wanted > to > know if anybody has developed a custom Crystal Report (.rpt) file to work > with the Site Protector RealSecureDB. If for example I took a report > policy > from the workgroup 6.6 manager and imported it into Crystal Reports, is > there a way to change all the database values to point to the new > RealSecureDB? > > best regards, > Simon. > > > > >
