TO UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe issforum" in the body of your message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for help with any problems!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ultimately, yes.

Matthew

-----Original Message-----
From: Chan Kien Eng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 10:41 PM
To: Ward, Matthew (ISSAtlanta); [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Site Protector Reporting


So, does that mean SP 2.0 will replace SSD 2.6?

Thanks

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
Of
> Ward, Matthew (ISSAtlanta)
> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 9:46 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Site Protector Reporting
> 
> 
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe issforum" in the body of your
message
> to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for help with any
> problems!
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> --
> 
> Hello,
> 
> My name is Matthew Ward and I am now the Product Manager for
SiteProtector.
> It is not normally my practice to spam issforum with product
information,
> but I thought that since folks keep mentioning this thread to me, I
ought
> to give you guys a little information so that you can make the best
> possible decision as you decide what to build in the interim. Here is
what
> SiteProtector is going to have in SiteProtector 2.0, due out in Q4:
> 
> 1) Graphical reports that display metrics of security information
across
> products for management (Attacks, vulnerabilities and Attacked
> vulnerabilities if you have fusion)
> 2) Graphical reports that display the trends across SiteProtector
groups,
> again, geared for management
> 3) Detail analysis reports ranging from more summary information to
the
> nitty gritty parameters of the events and vulnerabilities.
> 4) All of the views from FastAnalysis, plus similar views for
> vulnerability analysis. When we start importing 3rd party data, that
data
> will be analyzed in a similar fashion.
> 5) Right click navigations in a FastAnalysis-like fashion to guide the
> user through security analysis.
> 6) All of the text and graphical views can be exported to HTML, PDF,
CSV
> and Printer, and you can do so either on demand or on a schedule.
> 7) Lastly, we will have cross-site reporting, so you can perform
reporting
> across multiple sites.
> 
> So, in deciding what to build yourself, bear the above in mind as to
how
> far you go. I personally know that you can build a few, very effective
> reports in a short period of time to get the maximum value with the
> minimum work, and you may want to avoid reports that are more
complicated
> that you may be able to live without for the remaining period of
time...
> 
> I have presented the reports to many customers and have come to the
> conclusion that reporting will be at least satisfactory in
SiteProtector
> 2.0, so hopefully that will alleviate your concerns and difficulties
with
> ISS reporting in general.
> 
> Matthew
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nguyen, Jimmy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 3:06 PM
> To: 'Lanzilotta, Chris S. (MBS)'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: Site Protector Reporting
> 
> 
> 
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe issforum" in the body of your
message
> to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for help with any
> problems!
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> --
> 
> I probably would at least do substantial damage for a reporting
feature in
> SiteProtector as well.  I also have been told that this capability
will be
> in the next release.  I believe in the interim that there is a tool
that
> can
> help facilitate reporting in SiteProtector and that it resides on the
ISS
> ftp site, but if you ftp://www.iss.net, nothings there, well at least
not
> for an anonymous login.
> 
> Jimmy H. Nguyen
> Senior Network Security Engineer
> CCNP, CCDP, MCSE, MCP+I, NSA IAM, CCSE, Network+, SCP
> NCI Information Systems, Inc.
> DRMS Headquarters Battle Creek, MI.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 616-961-4543
> 
> "Because this is engineering and not mathematics, inifinity turns out
to
> be
> 15." -Radia Perlman
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lanzilotta, Chris S. (MBS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 6:48 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Site Protector Reporting
> 
> 
> 
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe issforum" in the body of your
message
> to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for help with any
> problems!
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> --
> 
> I would kill for this... Well maybe not kill, but you get the point!!!
> 
> This is just one of the sorely missed features that should have been
> released in SiteProtector from the start.  I keep hearing it will be
in
> the
> next release, whenever that is.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon Desmeules [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:51 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Site Protector Reporting
> 
> 
> 
> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: email "unsubscribe issforum" in the body of your
message
> to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for help with any
> problems!
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> --
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Site Protector doesn't come along with the reporting function and
wanted
> to
> know if anybody has developed a custom Crystal Report (.rpt) file to
work
> with the Site Protector RealSecureDB.  If for example I took a report
> policy
> from the workgroup 6.6 manager and imported it into Crystal Reports,
is
> there a way to change all the database values to point to the new
> RealSecureDB?
> 
> best regards,
> Simon.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



Reply via email to