[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-196?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16732954#comment-16732954
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on ARTEMIS-196:
----------------------------------------
Github user franz1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/2488#discussion_r244976790
--- Diff:
artemis-server/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/core/server/Consumer.java
---
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
import org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.filter.Filter;
import org.apache.activemq.artemis.spi.core.protocol.SessionCallback;
-public interface Consumer {
+public interface Consumer extends PriorityAware {
--- End diff --
Just a design q: why using a specific `PriorityAware` interface?
I'm assuming that we can't have anymore a `Consumer` that doesn't provide a
`default int getPriority()`
> Implementing Consumer Priority
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: ARTEMIS-196
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-196
> Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: OpenWire
> Affects Versions: 1.0.0
> Reporter: Howard Gao
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: unscheduled
>
>
> ref: http://activemq.apache.org/consumer-priority.html
> org.apache.activemq.QueueConsumerPriorityTest
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
