[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-9829?focusedWorklogId=1001045&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-1001045
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on AMQ-9829:
---------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 20/Jan/26 17:42
            Start Date: 20/Jan/26 17:42
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: jeanouii commented on code in PR #1616:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/1616#discussion_r2709419792


##########
activemq-client/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/ActiveMQMessageConsumer.java:
##########
@@ -771,6 +778,9 @@ void clearMessagesInProgress() {
                     // ensure unconsumed are rolledback up front as they may 
get redelivered to another consumer
                     List<MessageDispatch> list = 
unconsumedMessages.removeAll();
                     if (!this.info.isBrowser()) {
+                        if (session.isTransacted()) {
+                            
capturePrefetchedMessagesForDuplicateSuppression(list);

Review Comment:
   @cshannon you are totally correct. There is no need to iterate twice. Good 
catch!
   
   Your proposal works fully. 
   We could probably even simply the method like this 
   
   ```
   private void capturePrefetchedMessagesForDuplicateSuppression(final 
MessageDispatch pending) {
       if (pending.getMessage() == null) return; // nothing to do
       if (previouslyDeliveredMessages == null) {
           previouslyDeliveredMessages = new 
PreviouslyDeliveredMap<>(session.getTransactionContext().getTransactionId());
       }
       previouslyDeliveredMessages.put(pending.getMessage().getMessageId(), new 
PreviouslyDelivered(pending, false, true));
       LOG.trace("{} tracking existing transacted {} prefetched ({})", 
getConsumerId(), previouslyDeliveredMessages.transactionId, pending);
   }
   ```
   
   
   
   





Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 1001045)
    Time Spent: 1h 40m  (was: 1.5h)

> Track prefetched messages for duplicate suppression during failover
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-9829
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-9829
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Jean-Louis Monteiro
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 1h 40m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Discovered with {{FailoverDurableSubTransactionTest}} flacky test
> During failover, messages were wrongly detected as being duplicated and sent 
> to DLQ.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
For further information, visit: https://activemq.apache.org/contact


Reply via email to