[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-5573?focusedWorklogId=1013621&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-1013621
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on ARTEMIS-5573:
-------------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 06/Apr/26 21:43
            Start Date: 06/Apr/26 21:43
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: tabish121 commented on PR #6323:
URL: https://github.com/apache/artemis/pull/6323#issuecomment-4195178685

   > I think this is ready now
   
   Please don't merge it until others have had a chance to review it




Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 1013621)
    Time Spent: 1h 50m  (was: 1h 40m)

> Make AMQP Size immutable
> ------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARTEMIS-5573
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-5573
>             Project: Artemis
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: AMQP
>    Affects Versions: 2.41.0
>            Reporter: Clebert Suconic
>            Assignee: Clebert Suconic
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>          Time Spent: 1h 50m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> I have had a lot of issues, even recently on races between re-evaluating a 
> message size in AMQP.
> Say a lazy decode happens at the wrong time and the memory estimates can be 
> wrong.
> We have fixed issues along the years, but this is still a fragile process 
> that is bound to fail. If an user for instance add a plugin breaking the 
> chain of events.
> For that reason the memory estimate should already include enough estimation 
> for any properties decoded and the process should be simplified.
> Less moving parts would mean less possibilities for bugs.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to