[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-5573?focusedWorklogId=1013866&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-1013866
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on ARTEMIS-5573:
-------------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 07/Apr/26 20:25
            Start Date: 07/Apr/26 20:25
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: clebertsuconic commented on code in PR #6323:
URL: https://github.com/apache/artemis/pull/6323#discussion_r3047675595


##########
artemis-protocols/artemis-amqp-protocol/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/protocol/amqp/broker/AMQPMessage.java:
##########
@@ -759,6 +743,44 @@ protected synchronized void scanMessageData(ReadableBuffer 
data) {
       this.messageDataScanned = MessageDataScanningStatus.SCANNED.code;
    }
 
+   public int getApplicationPropertiesCount() {
+      ensureScanning();
+      return applicationPropertiesCount;
+   }
+
+
+   // this is "borrowed" from:
+   // 
https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton-j/blob/6dc5587f1d1b23969a8994f1755198e638e92bc4/proton-j/src/main/java/org/apache/qpid/proton/codec/messaging/FastPathApplicationPropertiesType.java#L93-L115

Review Comment:
   This is doing the same validation thst was being done before. 
   
   If you follow the previous call all cobstructor.skipvalue does is read the 
value and move the bytes. 





Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 1013866)
    Time Spent: 4h  (was: 3h 50m)

> Make AMQP Size immutable
> ------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARTEMIS-5573
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-5573
>             Project: Artemis
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: AMQP
>    Affects Versions: 2.41.0
>            Reporter: Clebert Suconic
>            Assignee: Clebert Suconic
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>          Time Spent: 4h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> I have had a lot of issues, even recently on races between re-evaluating a 
> message size in AMQP.
> Say a lazy decode happens at the wrong time and the memory estimates can be 
> wrong.
> We have fixed issues along the years, but this is still a fragile process 
> that is bound to fail. If an user for instance add a plugin breaking the 
> chain of events.
> For that reason the memory estimate should already include enough estimation 
> for any properties decoded and the process should be simplified.
> Less moving parts would mean less possibilities for bugs.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to