sijie commented on a change in pull request #889: BP-14 Implementation of 
WriteFlag.DEFERRED_SYNC on Journal
URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/889#discussion_r161957542
 
 

 ##########
 File path: 
bookkeeper-server/src/main/java/org/apache/bookkeeper/bookie/Journal.java
 ##########
 @@ -959,19 +979,31 @@ public void run() {
                             }
                             journalFlushWatcher.reset().start();
                             bc.flush(false);
+
+                            for (int i = 0; i < toFlush.size(); i++) {
+                                QueueEntry entry = toFlush.get(i);
+                                if (entry != null && (!syncData || 
entry.ackBeforeSync)) {
+                                    toFlush.set(i, null);
+                                    numEntriesToFlush--;
+                                    cbThreadPool.execute(entry);
+                                }
+                            }
+
                             lastFlushPosition = bc.position();
                             journalFlushStats.registerSuccessfulEvent(
                                     
journalFlushWatcher.stop().elapsed(TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS), TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS);
 
                             // Trace the lifetime of entries through 
persistence
                             if (LOG.isDebugEnabled()) {
                                 for (QueueEntry e : toFlush) {
-                                    LOG.debug("Written and queuing for flush 
Ledger: {}  Entry: {}",
-                                              e.ledgerId, e.entryId);
+                                    if (e != null) {
+                                        LOG.debug("Written and queuing for 
flush Ledger: {}  Entry: {}",
+                                                  e.ledgerId, e.entryId);
+                                    }
                                 }
                             }
 
-                            
forceWriteBatchEntriesStats.registerSuccessfulValue(toFlush.size());
+                            
forceWriteBatchEntriesStats.registerSuccessfulValue(numEntriesToFlush);
 
 Review comment:
   if you are changing to report `numEntriesToFlush`, you should also change 
`batchSize`. otherwise, you will have inconsistent metrics.
   
   However I don't think you need to change this here. because 
`forceWriteBatchEntries` and `forceWriteBatchBytes` are measuring how many 
entries/bytes per batch that submitted to force write queue. ackBeforeSync is 
only changing the ack behavior, it doesn't change the flushing or force write 
behavior. so we shouldn't change the metric here.
   
   In that sense, I don't see a need of `numEntriesToFlush`.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to