[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16622409#comment-16622409
]
Vladimir Sitnikov commented on CALCITE-2451:
--------------------------------------------
{quote} Also, you didn't address my point about matching deeper trees.{quote}
Please explain your concerns in more details.
I see just "so the code got more complicated".
That is not actionable. On top of that, it is not clear how to address that.
I can say that current withUnknownAsFalse is really hairy, so removing that
would simplify the code.
> RexSimplify: fuse unknownAsFalse and IS TRUE handling
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-2451
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2451
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: core
> Affects Versions: 1.17.0
> Reporter: Vladimir Sitnikov
> Assignee: Julian Hyde
> Priority: Major
>
> It looks like {{unknownAsFalse}} duplicates {{IS_TRUE}} handling.
> In other words, {{withUnknownAsFalse(true). simplfy(expr)}} is more or less
> comparable to {{simplify(isTrue(expr))}}
> Implementing {{IS_TRUE/IS_FALSE/...}} simplification possibilities might make
> {{unknownAsFalse}} obsolete.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
