[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-6108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13590674#comment-13590674
]
Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-6108:
------------------------------------
Yes Scott I agree. camel-jms should IMHO be *as-is* using the Spring API and
what it offers.
And spring TX can already support JTA / XA and local jms TX as well.
So this does not make sense for me to change camel-jms.
What is needed though is those related issues to add TX to OSGi blueprint that
uses the JTA API.
For camel-sjms it makes sense to support the JTA API.
> Refactor JMS Component to use JTA Transactions instead of Spring Transactions
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-6108
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-6108
> Project: Camel
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: camel-jms
> Reporter: Chris Geer
> Fix For: 3.0.0
>
>
> We love contributions as you know. May you find time to work on it?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
