[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-6108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13590957#comment-13590957
]
Chris Geer commented on CAMEL-6108:
-----------------------------------
I guess my main driver for wanting to refactor the current JMS component is
that the ActiveMQ component actually extends from it which means the ActiveMQ
component is tied to Spring as well. I'm ok changing to using the SJMS
component instead of the ActiveMQ component as long as I can get similar
capabilities.
Is there any benefit to have an ActiveMQ specific component that extends from
SJMS?
> Refactor JMS Component to use JTA Transactions instead of Spring Transactions
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-6108
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-6108
> Project: Camel
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: camel-jms
> Reporter: Chris Geer
> Fix For: 3.0.0
>
>
> We love contributions as you know. May you find time to work on it?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
