[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-9153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14904592#comment-14904592
]
Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-9153:
------------------------------------
Yeah that can be a good idea. Wonder if you can add an unit test if possible?
Also the coding style we use is to have } else { on the same line.
There is a page here how to build with checkstyle that checks for the code style
http://camel.apache.org/building.html
> ThreadPoolRejectedPolicy does not implement Abort as expected
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-9153
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-9153
> Project: Camel
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: camel-core
> Reporter: Michael Riedel
> Attachments: ThreadPoolRejectedPolicy-Abort.patch,
> ThreadPoolRejectedPolicy-AbortNonRejectable.patch
>
>
> Not sure if this is a bug or just a documentation flaw (in fact I could not
> find documentation for it). Nevertheless, as a naive user, I kind of expected
> that the {{RejectedExecutionHandler}} of {{ThreadPoolRejectedPolicy.Abort}}
> would have similar semantics as Java's {{ThreadPoolExecutor.AbortPolicy}}.
> That is, I expected it to throw an {{Exception}}.
> Currently (that is in the 2.15.2 release, and on the master branch in git)
> that is not the case. In fact, {{Abort}} seems to work exactly the same way
> as {{Discard}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
