yugan95 commented on code in PR #3801:
URL: https://github.com/apache/celeborn/pull/3801#discussion_r3795295215


##########
cpp/celeborn/network/MessageDispatcher.cpp:
##########
@@ -176,12 +218,88 @@ folly::Future<std::unique_ptr<Message>> 
MessageDispatcher::operator()(
         return p.getFuture();
       });
 
-  this->pipeline_->write(std::move(toSendMsg));
+  // Observe the write future, like Java's TransportClient does with
+  // StdChannelListener. wangle's AsyncSocketHandler::write returns an
+  // already-failed future when the socket is no longer good, and otherwise
+  // fails it from AsyncTransport::WriteCallback::writeErr. Neither necessarily
+  // flips closed_ before the check below, so dropping the future would leave
+  // the promise pending until the request timeout.
+  this->pipeline_->write(std::move(toSendMsg))
+      .thenError([this, requestId](const folly::exception_wrapper& e) {
+        // Phrased like the Java listener's message so that
+        // ShuffleClientImpl::getPushDataFailCause classifies it as a
+        // connection failure rather than a non-critical one.
+        failPendingRequest(
+            requestId,
+            fmt::format(
+                "Failed to send request {}, errorMsg: {}",
+                requestId,
+                e.what().toStdString()));
+      });

Review Comment:
   Done, the second option: `state->retire(reason)` marks the connection 
unavailable and fails everything still outstanding on it retriably — the 
`failOutstandingRequests` analogue — called from all three write continuations, 
`close()` and `~MessageDispatcher`. Not `close()` from here, for the reason in 
your other comment: it needs `this` and `pipeline_`. The socket is closed by 
wangle's read-side error handling anyway.
   
   On the test: `failedWriteMakesTransportClientInactive` asserts `active()` is 
false after a failed write, which is what the factory gates reuse on 
(`TransportClient.cpp:315`). The factory reconnecting end to end does need a 
listening socket, and there is no server-side scaffolding under `cpp/` yet — 
say the word and I'll add it here.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to