[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-851?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13439584#comment-13439584
]
Sébastien Brisard commented on MATH-851:
----------------------------------------
I'm OK with that, only I didn't know there *was* a consensus. I remember having
asked the question a few months ago, and being rebuked, the answer being "as
long as the comment makes sense, it's OK". That's the reason why I took the
liberty to say to Clemens he should feel free to adopt any convention. That was
a wrong suggestion and I do apologize.
I'm actually happier with less fuzzy rules, as long as they are stated. From
now on, I'll do my best to stick with these rules. Shouldn't we write these
rules in the developers guide (I can take care of that)? That would avoid
endless discussions?
> Add convolution
> ---------------
>
> Key: MATH-851
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-851
> Project: Commons Math
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Clemens Novak
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: Filter.java, FilterTest.java, FilterUtils.java,
> FilterUtils.java, FilterUtilsTest.java, FilterUtilsTest.java
>
>
> I created a function performing (one-dimensional) convolution. Currently, the
> function is in a class called Filter, but I am not sure whether this is the
> appropriate place for it(?).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
