[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEOMETRY-23?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16678197#comment-16678197
 ] 

Gilles commented on GEOMETRY-23:
--------------------------------

OK.
 Let's assume that within this library, the term "vector" means "Cartesian".
 Then please
 * remove the {{ofSpherical}} and {{toSpherical}} methods in order to remove 
the circular dependency between {{Vector3D}} and {{SphericalCoordinates}} 
(since {{Vector3D}} is the low-level object, conversion to and from it should 
be handled in the higher-level object),
 * ditto for the {{ofPolar}} and {{toPolar}} in {{Vector2D}},
 * rename {{ofArray}} to {{of}}.

Side note: The RAT report signals license non-compliances in module 
{{commons-geometry-euclidean}} in the "test" area (python code). Could you 
please look whether a header can be added; if not, the files should be removed 
from the RAT check in the POM file. Thanks.

> Remove Euclidean Point Classes
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GEOMETRY-23
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEOMETRY-23
>             Project: Apache Commons Geometry
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Matt Juntunen
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> Based on discussion of the current Point/Vector API in GEOMETRY-14 and 
> research into other geometric libraries, I think we should remove the 
> Euclidean Point?D classes and make Vector?D also implement Point. This will 
> end up being similar to the previous commons-math design but avoids the issue 
> raised in MATH-1284 since the Point and Vector interfaces are not related. 
> They just happen to be implemented by the same class, which we're calling 
> Vector?D since a vector can be used to indicate a point (by adding it to the 
> origin).
> In the course of trying this out this design, I ended up removing 7 classes 
> and simplifying several methods. I think that's a good indicator that this is 
> a good design choice.
>  
> Pull request: https://github.com/apache/commons-geometry/pull/15



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to