[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1601?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17183907#comment-17183907
]
Gilles Sadowski commented on LANG-1601:
---------------------------------------
{quote}I checked commons-number's class Fraction's function pow. It looks good,
and seems can be ported to commons-lang after several changes. [...] really far
faster now.
{quote}
Isn't this class the typical example of why code duplication is to be avoided?
My remark aimed at deprecating/removing the code in [Lang] after ensuring that
the functionality is correctly implemented in [Numbers].
The differences which you note are implementation details: They don't pertain
to the concept of fraction; so a user of [Lang]'s implementation should be able
to switch to [Numbers]'s implementation without loosing any important
functionality.
> refine performance of Fraction.pow
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: LANG-1601
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1601
> Project: Commons Lang
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: lang.math.*
> Reporter: Jin Xu
> Priority: Minor
> Time Spent: 1h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/611
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
