[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1601?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17183914#comment-17183914
]
Jin Xu commented on LANG-1601:
------------------------------
[~erans]
Hi.
??Isn't this class the typical example of why code duplication is to be
avoided???
Agreed.
??My remark aimed at deprecating/removing the code in [Lang] after ensuring
that the functionality is correctly implemented in [Numbers].??
Agreed, but we'd better discuss about this with gary.
??The differences which you note are implementation details: They don't pertain
to the concept of fraction; so a user of [Lang]'s implementation should be able
to switch to [Numbers]'s implementation without loosing any important
functionality.??
Well, not quite.
They have a test for each of the points I pointed out...
So if we want to change Fractionpow in commons-lang's sources to versions in
commons-numbers, tests about those features will fail.
But yes, the main ideas/logics be same, and I don't think any human user will
have trouble in switching to numbers.
> refine performance of Fraction.pow
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: LANG-1601
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1601
> Project: Commons Lang
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: lang.math.*
> Reporter: Jin Xu
> Priority: Minor
> Time Spent: 1h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/611
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
