[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-5832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16193412#comment-16193412
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on DRILL-5832:
---------------------------------------

Github user sachouche commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/970#discussion_r143020963
  
    --- Diff: 
exec/java-exec/src/test/java/org/apache/drill/exec/physical/impl/writer/TestParquetWriter.java
 ---
    @@ -184,25 +183,26 @@ public void testAllScalarTypes() throws Exception {
     
         try {
           // read all of the types with the complex reader
    -      test(String.format("alter session set %s = true", 
ExecConstants.PARQUET_NEW_RECORD_READER));
    +      alterSession(ExecConstants.PARQUET_NEW_RECORD_READER, true);
    --- End diff --
    
    Paul,
    
    - I noticed the key PARQUET_NEW_RECORD_READER is erroneous
    - There are currently two readers
       o The old one is used when nested data is used as it can handle all 
parquet use-cases
       o The new reader only deals with Flat parquet data types
    - We might want to rename the keys as the new reader cannot always be 
substituted with the old one 



> Migrate OperatorFixture to use SystemOptionManager rather than mock
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DRILL-5832
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-5832
>             Project: Apache Drill
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 1.12.0
>            Reporter: Paul Rogers
>            Assignee: Paul Rogers
>             Fix For: 1.12.0
>
>
> The {{OperatorFixture}} provides structure for testing individual operators 
> and other "sub-operator" bits of code. To do that, the framework provides 
> mock network-free and server-free versions of the fragment context and 
> operator context.
> As part of the mock, the {{OperatorFixture}} provides a mock version of the 
> system option manager that provides a simple test-only implementation of an 
> option set.
> With the recent major changes to the system option manager, this mock 
> implementation has drifted out of sync with the system option manager. Rather 
> than upgrading the mock implementation, this ticket asks to use the system 
> option manager directly -- but configured for no ZK or file persistence of 
> options.
> The key reason for this change is that the system option manager has 
> implemented a sophisticated way to handle option defaults; it is better to 
> leverage that than to provide a mock implementation.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to