[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-1154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17211160#comment-17211160
]
Michael Vorburger commented on FINERACT-1154:
---------------------------------------------
[~ptuomola] No, I do like it. To be more explicit and clear than my too long
comment: I'm all for "someone" to do "clean up" and to "merge back" the 1.4.0
release branch into develop! And also add this to
[https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/How+to+Release+Apache+Fineract]
so that it's done for 1.5.0. It's just not going to be me... ;)
> PS: Perhaps an email to the dev list to share that we agreed here to not keep
> release branches open may be appropriate.
FTR: I've done this on thread "No maintenance branches (FINERACT-1154)"
> Git branch strategy is wrong, use tags instead
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FINERACT-1154
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-1154
> Project: Apache Fineract
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Michael Vorburger
> Assignee: Petri Tuomola
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.5.0
>
>
> It seems wrong to me that we have 20 open branches (on
> https://github.com/apache/fineract/branches), including for the just released
> 1.4.0. IMHO a 1.4.0 should be a tag not a branch, and there could be a branch
> named 1.4.x instead - if anyone actually wanted to maintain that (which I
> doubt anyone does).
> [~aleks], [~ptuomola] or anyone else reading along here, do you agree?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
