[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-1948?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17750197#comment-17750197
]
Bharath Gowda commented on FINERACT-1948:
-----------------------------------------
[~ikimbrah] from what I understand, if we are looking into this
# to distinguish between the actual withdrawal and loan repayment
# to support during the dispute cases
both are already available with the withdrawal function itself as at the
back-end, the withdrawal is linked to the loan repayment and from the UI - if
you click on the withdrawal it shows all the loan details to which amount is
transferred to.
So I really do not see any business use case or a change in the scenario to
introduce a new transaction type all together.
That is my opinion . but we can always take rest of the community opinion by
voting on the mailing list and then decide
> Loan repayment by account transfer transaction type should not be withdrawal
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FINERACT-1948
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-1948
> Project: Apache Fineract
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 1.7.0, 1.8.1, 1.7.2, 1.8.2, 1.8.3
> Reporter: ibrahim kimbugwe
> Assignee: Francis Guchie
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.9.0, 1.8.4
>
> Attachments: image-2023-07-31-23-11-05-824.png
>
>
> When a user transfers money from a savings account to pay off a loan, the
> transaction type is tagged as a withdrawal yet this is a loan repayment. The
> transaction type should be adjusted to suit the transaction as it gets handy
> for repayments with standing instructions.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
