[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15995243#comment-15995243
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6334:
---------------------------------------
Github user fhueske commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3791#discussion_r114556553
--- Diff:
flink-libraries/flink-table/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/table/api/scala/TableConversions.scala
---
@@ -35,6 +36,10 @@ class TableConversions(table: Table) {
/** Converts the [[Table]] to a [[DataSet]] of the specified type. */
def toDataSet[T: TypeInformation]: DataSet[T] = {
+ if (UserDefinedFunctionUtils.verifyTableFunctionCallExistence(table)) {
--- End diff --
We should put this check into `Table.getRelNode`. This will catch all cases
when we try to translate a table.
> Refactoring UDTF interface
> --------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-6334
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6334
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Table API & SQL
> Reporter: Ruidong Li
> Assignee: Ruidong Li
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 1.3.0
>
>
> The current UDTF leverages the table.join(expression) interface, which is not
> a proper interface in terms of semantics. We would like to refactor this to
> let UDTF use table.join(table) interface. Very briefly, UDTF's apply method
> will return a Table Type, so Join(UDTF('a, 'b, ...) as 'c) shall be viewed as
> join(Table)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
