[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15995241#comment-15995241
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6334:
---------------------------------------
Github user fhueske commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3791#discussion_r114558126
--- Diff:
flink-libraries/flink-table/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/table/functions/utils/UserDefinedFunctionUtils.scala
---
@@ -358,4 +360,45 @@ object UserDefinedFunctionUtils {
InstantiationUtil
.deserializeObject[UserDefinedFunction](byteData,
Thread.currentThread.getContextClassLoader)
}
+
+ /**
+ * this method is used for create a [[LogicalTableFunctionCall]]
+ * @param tableEnv
+ * @param udtf a String represent a TableFunction Call e.g "split(c)"
+ * @return
+ */
+ def createLogicalFunctionCall(tableEnv: TableEnvironment, udtf: String)
= {
--- End diff --
Add return type to method
> Refactoring UDTF interface
> --------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-6334
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6334
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Table API & SQL
> Reporter: Ruidong Li
> Assignee: Ruidong Li
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 1.3.0
>
>
> The current UDTF leverages the table.join(expression) interface, which is not
> a proper interface in terms of semantics. We would like to refactor this to
> let UDTF use table.join(table) interface. Very briefly, UDTF's apply method
> will return a Table Type, so Join(UDTF('a, 'b, ...) as 'c) shall be viewed as
> join(Table)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
