[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7378?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16147004#comment-16147004
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-7378:
---------------------------------------

Github user NicoK commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4485#discussion_r136019424
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-runtime/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/io/network/NetworkEnvironmentTest.java
 ---
    @@ -144,7 +150,7 @@ private static ResultPartition createResultPartition(
         * @return mock with minimal functionality necessary by {@link 
NetworkEnvironment#registerTask(Task)}
         */
        private static SingleInputGate createSingleInputGateMock(
    -                   final ResultPartitionType partitionType, final int 
channels) {
    +                   final ResultPartitionType partitionType, final int 
channels) throws IOException {
    --- End diff --
    
    remove - this exception is not thrown by the added code


> Create a fix size (non rebalancing) buffer pool type for the floating buffers
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-7378
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7378
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: zhijiang
>            Assignee: zhijiang
>             Fix For: 1.4.0
>
>
> Currently the number of network buffers in {{LocalBufferPool}} for 
> {{SingleInputGate}} is limited by {{a * <number of channels> + b}}, where a 
> is the number of exclusive buffers for each channel and b is the number of 
> floating buffers shared by all channels.
> Considering the credit-based flow control feature, we want to create a fix 
> size buffer pool used to manage the floating buffers for {{SingleInputGate}}. 
> And the exclusive buffers are assigned to {{InputChannel}}s directly.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to