[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16313212#comment-16313212
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-8203:
---------------------------------------
Github user fhueske commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5132#discussion_r159878618
--- Diff:
flink-libraries/flink-table/src/test/scala/org/apache/flink/table/api/stream/StreamTableEnvironmentValidationTest.scala
---
@@ -138,4 +145,25 @@ class StreamTableEnvironmentValidationTest extends
TableTestBase {
// we mix reference by position and by name
util.addTable[(Long, Int, String, Int, Long)]('x, '_1)
}
+
+ @Test(expected = classOf[TableException])
+ def testInvalidAliasWithProctimeAttribute(): Unit = {
+ val util = streamTestUtil()
+ // alias in proctime not allowed
+ util.addTable[(Int, Long, String)]('_1, ('newnew as 'new).proctime,
'_3)
--- End diff --
also add a test where proctime alias references an existing field and a
test for `'x.proctime` where `'x` is a valid field (if there isn't such a test
yet).
> Make schema definition of DataStream/DataSet to Table conversion more flexible
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-8203
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8203
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Table API & SQL
> Affects Versions: 1.4.0, 1.5.0
> Reporter: Fabian Hueske
> Assignee: Timo Walther
>
> When converting or registering a {{DataStream}} or {{DataSet}} as {{Table}},
> the schema of the table can be defined (by default it is extracted from the
> {{TypeInformation}}.
> The schema needs to be manually specified to select (project) fields, rename
> fields, or define time attributes. Right now, there are several limitations
> how the fields can be defined that also depend on the type of the
> {{DataStream}} / {{DataSet}}. Types with explicit field ordering (e.g.,
> tuples, case classes, Row) require schema definition based on the position of
> fields. Pojo types which have no fixed order of fields, require to refer to
> fields by name. Moreover, there are several restrictions on how time
> attributes can be defined, e.g., event time attribute must replace an
> existing field or be appended and proctime attributes must be appended.
> I think we can make the schema definition more flexible and provide two modes:
> 1. Reference input fields by name: All fields in the schema definition are
> referenced by name (and possibly renamed using an alias ({{as}}). In this
> mode, fields can be reordered and projected out. Moreover, we can define
> proctime and eventtime attributes at arbitrary positions using arbitrary
> names (except those that existing the result schema). This mode can be used
> for any input type, including POJOs. This mode is used if all field
> references exist in the input type.
> 2. Reference input fields by position: Field references might not refer to
> existing fields in the input type. In this mode, fields are simply renamed.
> Event-time attributes can replace the field on their position in the input
> data (if it is of correct type) or be appended at the end. Proctime
> attributes must be appended at the end. This mode can only be used if the
> input type has a defined field order (tuple, case class, Row).
> We need to add more tests the check for all combinations of input types and
> schema definition modes.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
