Github user twalthr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5240#discussion_r163840224
--- Diff:
flink-libraries/flink-table/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/table/descriptors/JSON.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.flink.table.descriptors
+
+import java.util
+
+import org.apache.flink.api.common.typeinfo.TypeInformation
+import org.apache.flink.table.api.TableSchema
+
+import scala.collection.mutable
+import scala.collection.JavaConverters._
+
+/**
+ * Encoding descriptor for JSON.
+ */
+class JSON extends EncodingDescriptor("json") {
--- End diff --
I think relying on a standard is a good idea. We should add this as a
follow-up issue. It is not trivial to add the JSON schema because we have to
decide how we treat e.g. the type `number` or `"type": "string", "format":
"date"` or enums (http://json-schema.org/example2.html).
---
