[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16526540#comment-16526540
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9456:
---------------------------------------

Github user tillrohrmann commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6132#discussion_r198489897
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-mesos/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/mesos/runtime/clusterframework/MesosResourceManager.java
 ---
    @@ -619,7 +619,11 @@ public void taskTerminated(TaskMonitor.TaskTerminated 
message) {
                        startNewWorker(launched.profile());
                }
     
    -           closeTaskManagerConnection(id, new 
Exception(status.getMessage()));
    +           final Exception terminatedCause = new 
Exception(status.getMessage());
    --- End diff --
    
    let's call it `terminationCause`


> Let ResourceManager notify JobManager about failed/killed TaskManagers
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-9456
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9456
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Distributed Coordination
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.0
>            Reporter: Till Rohrmann
>            Assignee: Sihua Zhou
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 1.6.0, 1.5.1
>
>
> Often, the {{ResourceManager}} learns faster about TaskManager 
> failures/killings because it directly communicates with the underlying 
> resource management framework. Instead of only relying on the 
> {{JobManager}}'s heartbeat to figure out that a {{TaskManager}} has died, we 
> should additionally send a signal from the {{ResourceManager}} to the 
> {{JobManager}} if a {{TaskManager}} has died. That way, we can react faster 
> to {{TaskManager}} failures and recover our running job/s.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to