[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16544672#comment-16544672
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-9489:
---------------------------------------

Github user tillrohrmann commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6333#discussion_r202552483
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/state/KeyExtractorFunction.java
 ---
    @@ -28,9 +28,22 @@
     @FunctionalInterface
     public interface KeyExtractorFunction<T> {
     
    +   KeyExtractorFunction<? extends Keyed<?>> FOR_KEYED_OBJECTS = new 
KeyExtractorFunction<Keyed<?>>() {
    +           @Nonnull
    +           @Override
    +           public Object extractKeyFromElement(@Nonnull Keyed<?> element) {
    +                   return element.getKey();
    +           }
    +   };
    --- End diff --
    
    Could we move this extractor into its own `KeyedKeyExtractorFunction` 
singleton?


> Checkpoint timers as part of managed keyed state instead of raw keyed state
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-9489
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9489
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: State Backends, Checkpointing
>            Reporter: Stefan Richter
>            Assignee: Stefan Richter
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 1.6.0
>
>
> Timer state should now become part of the keyed state backend snapshot, i.e., 
> stored inside the managed keyed state. This means that we have to connect our 
> preparation for asynchronous checkpoints with the backend, so that the timers 
> are written as part of the state for each key-group. This means that we will 
> also free up the raw keyed state an might expose it to user functions in the 
> future.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to