bowenli86 commented on a change in pull request #9979: [FLINK-14417][table] 
Develop CoreModule to provide Flink built-in functions
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/9979#discussion_r338777772
 
 

 ##########
 File path: 
flink-table/flink-table-api-java/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/table/catalog/FunctionCatalog.java
 ##########
 @@ -203,39 +201,40 @@ public void 
registerTempCatalogScalarFunction(ObjectIdentifier oi, ScalarFunctio
                Set<String> result = getUserDefinedFunctionNames();
 
                // Get built-in functions
-               result.addAll(
-                       BuiltInFunctionDefinitions.getDefinitions()
-                               .stream()
-                               .map(f -> normalizeName(f.getName()))
-                               .collect(Collectors.toSet())
-               );
+               result.addAll(moduleManager.listFunctions());
 
                return result.toArray(new String[0]);
        }
 
        private Set<String> getUserDefinedFunctionNames() {
                Set<String> result = new HashSet<>();
 
-               // Get functions in catalog
+               // add catalog functions
                Catalog catalog = 
catalogManager.getCatalog(catalogManager.getCurrentCatalog()).get();
                try {
                        
result.addAll(catalog.listFunctions(catalogManager.getCurrentDatabase()));
                } catch (DatabaseNotExistException e) {
                        // Ignore since there will always be a current database 
of the current catalog
                }
 
-               // Get functions registered in memory
+               // add temp system functions
                result.addAll(
                        tempSystemFunctions.values().stream()
                                .map(FunctionDefinition::toString)
                                .collect(Collectors.toSet()));
 
+               // add temp catalog functions
+               result.addAll(
+                       tempCatalogFunctions.values().stream()
+                               .map(FunctionDefinition::toString)
+                               .collect(Collectors.toSet()));
 
 Review comment:
   The order shouldn't matter since it only shows a deduped set of names and 
don't interfere with func resolution. 
   Sorry, this actually has nothing to do with code module and I will revert 
it. Should be done in a separate PR

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to