igalshilman commented on a change in pull request #127:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun/pull/127#discussion_r450220253
##########
File path: docs/deployment-and-operations/packaging.md
##########
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ The provided base image allows teams to package their
applications with all the
Below is an example Dockerfile for building a Stateful Functions image with
both an [embedded module]({{ site.baseurl }}/sdk/modules.html#embedded-module)
and a [remote module]({{ site.baseurl }}/sdk/modules.html#remote-module) for an
application called ``statefun-example``.
{% highlight dockerfile %}
-FROM flink-statefun:{{ site.version }}
+FROM ververica/flink-statefun:{{ site.version }}
Review comment:
Maybe that should be brought up to a vote/discussion in the mailing
list? what do you think @uce can you raise that issue?
My personal opinion here, that currently it is not a nice experience for
anyone how would like to try the project and I don't see any progress in
https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/pull/7749
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
