1996fanrui commented on code in PR #19993: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/19993#discussion_r900755285
########## flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/checkpoint/channel/ChannelStateWriteRequest.java: ########## @@ -98,6 +98,9 @@ static ChannelStateWriteRequest buildFutureWriteRequest( List<Buffer> buffers; try { buffers = dataFuture.get(); + } catch (InterruptedException e) { + writer.fail(e); + throw e; Review Comment: Hi @zentol @pnowojski , I replied in [FLINK-27792](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-27792). And I think the root cause of FLINK-27792 is we don't have a reasonable cleanup dataFuture in discardAction, so we should improve the discardAction. I improved action in this change because it is also a bug, we should continue throw InterruptedException here. And I think this change and [FLINK-27792](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-27792) are different. And I think the [FLINK-27792](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-27792) is the same root cause as [FLINK-28077](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-28077), that is next change in this PR. Defective discardAction resulted in FLINK-27792 and FLINK-28077. Once this PR is done, they will be resolved. I know next change still has some bugs, it may cause network memory leak. I will think more and think about how to solve it. What do you think? If anything is wrong, please correct me. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org