kumar-mallikarjuna commented on code in PR #25027:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/25027#discussion_r1681117423
##########
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/dispatcher/DefaultJobManagerRunnerRegistry.java:
##########
@@ -97,6 +106,14 @@ public JobManagerRunner unregister(JobID jobId) {
return this.jobManagerRunners.remove(jobId);
}
+ public void setMainThreadExecutor(ComponentMainThreadExecutor executor) {
+ mainThreadExecutor = executor;
+ }
+
+ public ComponentMainThreadExecutor getMainThreadExecutor() {
+ return mainThreadExecutor;
+ }
+
Review Comment:
Is [initializing these
attributes](https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/583aadf97b2e3ddc87d4d244c5d62823e82513b1/flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/dispatcher/Dispatcher.java#L272-L333)
outside of the `Dispatcher` constructor a bad idea?
I'm thinking instead of having the constructor chain, we could have two
"base" constructors for `Dispatcher` only:
```java
public Dispatcher(
RpcService rpcService,
DispatcherId fencingToken,
Collection<JobGraph> recoveredJobs,
Collection<JobResult> recoveredDirtyJobs,
DispatcherBootstrapFactory dispatcherBootstrapFactory,
DispatcherServices dispatcherServices)
```
and
```java
protected Dispatcher(
RpcService rpcService,
DispatcherId fencingToken,
Collection<JobGraph> recoveredJobs,
Collection<JobResult> recoveredDirtyJobs,
DispatcherBootstrapFactory dispatcherBootstrapFactory,
DispatcherServices dispatcherServices,
JobManagerRunnerRegistry jobManagerRunnerRegistry,
ResourceCleanerFactory resourceCleanerFactory)
```
which call `super()` and a method `initDispatcher(...)` - to populate the
attributes.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
