twalthr commented on code in PR #258:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/flink-connector-kafka/pull/258#discussion_r3326667187
##########
flink-connector-kafka/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/connectors/kafka/table/KafkaDynamicSource.java:
##########
@@ -623,6 +625,42 @@ public Object read(ConsumerRecord<?, ?> record) {
}
}),
+ /**
+ * Wire-faithful alternative to {@code headers}: preserves duplicate
keys and insertion
+ * order using {@code ARRAY<ROW<key STRING, value BYTES>>} instead of
a lossy MAP.
+ */
+ MULTI_HEADERS(
+ "multi-headers",
Review Comment:
The reason for `multi-` came from the multimap concept. Basically, the same
content as `headers` just as a multimap. But I'm also fine with `header-list`
if the majority agrees. But then the question arises `headers-list` or
`header-list`?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
