Github user shaoxuan-wang commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3423#discussion_r103835523
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-libraries/flink-table/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/table/runtime/aggregate/AggregateUtil.scala
 ---
    @@ -54,31 +58,31 @@ object AggregateUtil {
         * organized by the following format:
         *
         * {{{
    -    *                   avg(x) aggOffsetInRow = 2          count(z) 
aggOffsetInRow = 5
    -    *                             |                          |
    -    *                             v                          v
    -    *        +---------+---------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
    -    *        |groupKey1|groupKey2|  sum1  | count1 |  sum2  | count2 |
    -    *        +---------+---------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
    +    *                          avg(x)                             count(z)
    +    *                             |                                   |
    +    *                             v                                   v
    +    *        
+---------+---------+-----------------+------------------+------------------+
    +    *        |groupKey1|groupKey2|  AvgAccumulator |  SumAccumulator  | 
CountAccumulator |
    +    *        
+---------+---------+-----------------+------------------+------------------+
         *                                              ^
         *                                              |
    -    *                               sum(y) aggOffsetInRow = 4
    +    *                                           sum(y)
         * }}}
         *
         */
       private[flink] def createPrepareMapFunction(
           namedAggregates: Seq[CalcitePair[AggregateCall, String]],
           groupings: Array[Int],
           inputType: RelDataType)
    -    : MapFunction[Row, Row] = {
    --- End diff --
    
    Ok, based on the DEV discussion, I thought we are going to fix the code 
style in the new PRs. But you are right, I should just keep the style changes 
in the new lines. I will discard the "style only" change.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to