wuchong commented on issue #2091: URL: https://github.com/apache/fluss/issues/2091#issuecomment-3690742646
Thanks @rionmonster for the explanation. In my opinion, this is a Flink bug that has already been fixed in Flink 2.2 and cannot (and should not) be addressed from the Fluss side. Moreover, Fluss does not suffer from the same stack overflow issue as Flink, because we never Java-serialize exceptions. Therefore, the safeguard added in `ExceptionUtils#firstOrSuppressed` is unnecessary and only adds unnecessary complexity to the codebase. Given this, can we close this issue? cc @swuferhong -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
