[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUACAMOLE-1155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17179239#comment-17179239
]
Andy Vuong commented on GUACAMOLE-1155:
---------------------------------------
I am not well versed in software legal issues and would like a better
understanding.
A proposed {{guacamole/guacenc}} docker image distributed to Docker Hub that
mimics the current {{guacamole/guacd}} implementation would contain:
# The {{debian:stable-slim}} base image software
# The {{guacenc}} external runtime dependencies, to include FFmpeg’s shared
libraries ({{libav*}}) which are
## Installed by {{apt-get install …}}
## Built, packaged and distributed by Debian
([https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ffmpeg])
# The {{guacenc}} executable which dynamically links to the FFmpeg shared
libraries
FFmpeg legal considerations ([http://ffmpeg.org/legal.html]) appear to involve
these general topics:
# License compliance (LGPLv2.1, GPLv2+)
# Trademark
# Patented algorithms
Is the core concern related to the distribution of library that may contain
patented algorithms? Is it the distribution of libraries that may be covered by
LGPL/GPL? Is it Apache license compatibility? All of the above? None of the
above?
Can the Apache Software Foundation provide legal guidance?
> Provide users access to guacenc via docker
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GUACAMOLE-1155
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GUACAMOLE-1155
> Project: Guacamole
> Issue Type: Wish
> Reporter: Andy Vuong
> Priority: Minor
>
> I'm not sure if the project's preferred approach would be to :
> # Include guacenc in the guacamole/guacd image, OR
> # Create a standalone guacamole/guacenc image.
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
