[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13815875#comment-13815875
]
Nicolas Liochon commented on HBASE-9775:
----------------------------------------
The patch is not important, this jira is a kind of umbrella, the real meat has
been done on other patches, already committed (or not committable, which leads
to the same point: there is no patch to apply :-) )
What we're testing here is the baseline, like the graphs you were doing a while
ago: how .96 behaves compared to .94 with the default settings in both cases.
Thanks, Jean-Marc.
> Client write path perf issues
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-9775
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9775
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Client
> Affects Versions: 0.96.0
> Reporter: Elliott Clark
> Priority: Critical
> Attachments: 9775.rig.txt, 9775.rig.v2.patch, 9775.rig.v3.patch,
> Charts Search Cloudera Manager - ITBLL.png, Charts Search Cloudera
> Manager.png, hbase-9775.patch, job_run.log, short_ycsb.png, ycsb.png,
> ycsb_insert_94_vs_96.png
>
>
> Testing on larger clusters has not had the desired throughput increases.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
