[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13818806#comment-13818806
]
Nicolas Liochon commented on HBASE-9775:
----------------------------------------
The results a few month ago were (taken from HBASE-6295)
||Test||Trunk||Nic||0.95||
|org,apache,hadoop,hbase,PerformanceEvaluation$RandomReadTest|1377.08|1420.14|1390.50|
|org,apache,hadoop,hbase,PerformanceEvaluation$RandomScanWithRange100Test|11243.12|10992.68|10971.09|
|org,apache,hadoop,hbase,PerformanceEvaluation$RandomSeekScanTest|304.66|296.43|305.25|
|org,apache,hadoop,hbase,PerformanceEvaluation$RandomWriteTest|9176.07|13619.59|9134.09|
|org,apache,hadoop,hbase,PerformanceEvaluation$SequentialWriteTest|13592.40|42655.52|13255.12|
The writes seems to be much faster on your new computer, while the reads are
slower. But we still have an improvement on 0.96 for the writes...
> Client write path perf issues
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-9775
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9775
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Client
> Affects Versions: 0.96.0
> Reporter: Elliott Clark
> Priority: Critical
> Attachments: 9775.rig.txt, 9775.rig.v2.patch, 9775.rig.v3.patch,
> Charts Search Cloudera Manager - ITBLL.png, Charts Search Cloudera
> Manager.png, hbase-9775.patch, job_run.log, short_ycsb.png, ycsb.png,
> ycsb_insert_94_vs_96.png
>
>
> Testing on larger clusters has not had the desired throughput increases.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
