[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13815915#comment-13815915
]
Jean-Marc Spaggiari commented on HBASE-9775:
--------------------------------------------
Then it's perfect. 0.96 is running since yesterday, and I have 0.94 ready in
the pipe. Seems to take more than 12h per run, so results might come tomorrow
only.
Also, it's running in standalone, but I have 6 drives in this server (1 SSD + 5
SATA) so I can run it again in pseudo dist over the week-emd if we want...
> Client write path perf issues
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-9775
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9775
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Client
> Affects Versions: 0.96.0
> Reporter: Elliott Clark
> Priority: Critical
> Attachments: 9775.rig.txt, 9775.rig.v2.patch, 9775.rig.v3.patch,
> Charts Search Cloudera Manager - ITBLL.png, Charts Search Cloudera
> Manager.png, hbase-9775.patch, job_run.log, short_ycsb.png, ycsb.png,
> ycsb_insert_94_vs_96.png
>
>
> Testing on larger clusters has not had the desired throughput increases.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
