[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13897426#comment-13897426
]
Sergey Shelukhin commented on HBASE-10356:
------------------------------------------
bq. Can we fix the naming? An Action instance with a method named getAction is
confusing (not you I know...)
Will do separate patch on trunk probably.
bq. Do I have the model wrong then? This Action is for accounting on how this
'Action' did in the Multi request, right? My thinking is that server and region
accounting is done outside of the Action usually. I'd think which replica would
be done there w/o needing to mark this index on the Multi call.
I don't think Action has any particular model, it's just a context between
request and response time.
bq. The new Runnables need explanatory comments and better names . Should the
two types be related? Subclass? Do we need two Callable types?
Two types are not related. Will rename and add comments.
> Failover RPC's for multi-get
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-10356
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10356
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Client
> Reporter: Enis Soztutar
> Assignee: Sergey Shelukhin
> Fix For: 0.99.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-10356.reference.patch, HBASE-10356.reference.patch
>
>
> This is extension of HBASE-10355 to add failover support for multi-gets.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
