[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13950425#comment-13950425
 ] 

Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-10847:
---------------------------------------

Now the question is. Do I just change pom.xml to always include the security 
files like this:
{code}
+              <execution>
+                <id>add-source</id>
+                <goals>
+                  <goal>add-source</goal>
+                </goals>
+                <configuration>
+                  <sources>
+                    <source>${project.basedir}/security/src/main/java</source>
+                  </sources>
+                </configuration>
+              </execution>
{code}

or do I move the security files into place under src? The former is less 
disruptive, the latter is cleaner.


> 0.94: drop non-secure builds, make security the default
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-10847
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10847
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Lars Hofhansl
>             Fix For: 0.94.19
>
>
> I would like to only create a single 0.94 tarball/release that contains the 
> security code - and drop the non-secure tarballs and releases.
> Let's discuss...



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to