[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14000912#comment-14000912
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-11007:
-----------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12645430/11007.txt
against trunk revision .
ATTACHMENT ID: 12645430
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 6 new
or modified tests.
{color:red}-1 patch{color}. The patch command could not apply the patch.
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/9533//console
This message is automatically generated.
> BLOCKCACHE in schema descriptor seems not aptly named
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-11007
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11007
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 0.94.19
> Reporter: Varun Sharma
> Assignee: Varun Sharma
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 0.99.0
>
> Attachments: 11007.txt
>
>
> Hi,
> It seems that setting BLOCKCACHE key to false will disable the Data blocks
> from being cached but will continue to cache bloom and index blocks. This
> same property seems to be called cacheDataOnRead inside CacheConfig.
> Should this be called CACHE_DATA_ON_READ instead of BLOCKCACHE similar to the
> other CACHE_DATA_ON_WRITE/CACHE_INDEX_ON_WRITE. We got quite confused and
> ended up adding our own property CACHE_DATA_ON_READ - we also added some unit
> tests for the same.
> What do folks think about this ?
> Thanks
> Varun
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
