[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14575294#comment-14575294
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-13729:
--------------------------------

FAILURE: Integrated in HBase-1.0 #947 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-1.0/947/])
HBASE-13729 Old hbase.regionserver.global.memstore.upperLimit and lowerLimit 
properties are ignored if present (Esteban Guitierrez) (stack: rev 
9dd5e0ce984f16ca0616ed4b36e6f3aae35e912c)
* hbase-common/src/main/resources/hbase-default.xml


> Old hbase.regionserver.global.memstore.upperLimit and lowerLimit properties 
> are ignored if present
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-13729
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-13729
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: regionserver
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 1.0.1, 1.1.0
>            Reporter: Esteban Gutierrez
>            Assignee: Esteban Gutierrez
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.0.2, 1.2.0, 1.1.1
>
>         Attachments: 
> 0001-HBASE-13729-Old-hbase.regionserver.global.memstore.u.patch, 
> HBASE-13729.2.patch, HBASE-13729.3.patch, HBASE-13729.4.patch
>
>
> If hbase.regionserver.global.memstore.upperLimit or lowerLimit are present we 
> should use them instead of hbase.regionserver.global.memstore.size or 
> hbase.regionserver.global.memstore.size.lower.limit respectively. The current 
> implementation of HeapMemorySizeUtil.getGlobalMemStorePercent() and 
> getGlobalMemStoreLowerMark() asumes that if the new properties are not 
> defined then we should use the old configurations, however the new properties 
> are defined in hbase-default.xml which makes the old configuration names 
> useless and this has a direct impact when doing a rolling upgrade and 
> hbase-site.xml hasn't been changed to handle the new property names 
> exclusively.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to